Latest

Stand with Wisconsin

It is hard to put into words my reactions and feelings regarding what has been happening here in Madison. As the son of two State of Wisconsin employees, a recent University of Wisconsin graduate, local elected official, future teacher, and someone with future interests in public service, I have seen and experienced the happenings here through many different yet interrelated lenses. This post isn’t meant to be a holistic reflection on what is happening but a few thoughts on a few main topics.

I have been up at the State Capitol every day since Monday, Feb. 14th (and slept under the beautiful dome one night) and will continue to do my part to stand with and for the people and future of Wisconsin. I have been able to participate in some truly amazing times in Madison over the last few years. From being part of the events that brought President Obama to campus, twice, to rushing the field at Camp Randall, to hearing the Dalai Lama, to celebrating in the streets after the 2008 election and Packer Super Bowl win, the past few years have been eventful to say the least. But perhaps no cause or gathering has been more hard-hitting and thought-provoking than the events surrounding Gov. Walker’s proposed “budget repair bill.”

Anyone who has been around and in the Capitol lately can’t help but be deeply humbled by the passions and sense of unity and solidarity shared by all who share in this historic experience. While the chants are getting old, the weather cold, and the outcomes unknown, what keeps people going isn’t the free pizza or drum circles, it’s the overwhelming sense of pride. (the pizza does help though) Pride in Wisconsin, pride in the work people do, and pride because we know what we are doing is right.

Wisconsin has a long and proud history of leading the nation in expanding the rights of organized labor, working people, and the middle class. Unfortunately what Gov. Walker is proposing is not only in conflict with this history, it is a direct attack on the rights and freedoms that workers, both public and private, have earned here in Wisconsin. It is clear that what Gov. Walker is proposing isn’t about the money. It isn’t about the budget. It is about an ideology. This ideology prioritizes politics over people, the few over the many, and the self over the public good. While the state’s largest public employee unions have agreed to the financial concessions of contributing more for their health care and pensions, what they won’t concede is their right and ability to collectively bargain.

Public employees are willing to share in the sacrifices just as private employees and all taxpayers of the state have done. But don’t forget that, contrary to Gov. Walker’s rhetoric, public employees are taxpayers too. While the tenants of his plan use a strategy of divide and conquer, the public knows the value of treating its employees with respect because they know that those on the state’s payroll (teachers, nurses, police, firefighters, snow plow drivers, parks workers, etc…) work for the betterment of our communities, hence the term public employees. These aren’t just paper-pushers, these are our families, friends, and neighbors. These are the people who educate our kids and keep our communities safe. Gov. Walker has wrongly framed this debate as public haves vs. private have-nots. What a false, disingenuous, and calculating premise. While Gov. Walker may be skilled at repeating his veiled arguments on TV, just because he says something over and over again doesn’t make it true. And when what is being said seeks to divide people over a false sense of austerity, especially at a time of financial unease, it is politics at its worst. It is a race to the bottom, the lowest of the low.

While there are undoubtedly policy conversations about the way our public employees are compensated and contract for services, vilifying them as the most responsible source of our financial problems is irresponsible and irrational. I’m not here to rant about capitalism, tax policy, or Wall Street, but the fact that Gov. Walker is advancing his ideological battle to disband public unions under the guise of responsible budgeting is beyond ridiculous.

Gov. Walker claims that his proposal gives local governments and school boards the “tools” to deal with budget challenges. Please. The only “tools” given by Gov. Walker’s plans are a wrecking ball and sledge-hammer when what local governments and school boards need is a scalpel. This proposal even goes against what I thought was a Republican principle of local control, revealing it as nothing but a Trojan horse for an extreme and ideological agenda. Local governments and school boards didn’t ask for this and don’t support it. That’s why hundreds of local officials (including me) have signed a letter against the proposed changes to how WE bargain with OUR public employees. Collective bargaining works. It has worked with our public employees for over 50 years and there is no reason why all of a sudden it cannot work for another 50. I have yet to hear of or read about five local officials in Wisconsin in support of the proposed policy changes to collective bargaining. So spare the breath, Gov. Walker, you can’t say you are doing it for us (local officials) when we repeatedly say we don’t want it.

Gov. Walker may say what he is doing is FOR local governments, but really he is doing it TO local governments.

Responsible budgeting doesn’t allow those writing the balance sheets to choose what we want as the source of our problems and exploit this manufactured scapegoat for political, ideological, or personal reasons. Beyond the fact that Wisconsin has one of the strongest and most financially stable public pension systems and the reality that things like health benefits and pensions are negotiated as part of a total compensation package public employee unions have again said they are willing to accept the financial concessions. Talk about a shared sacrifice. Public employees don’t take the jobs they do because they are looking to get rich or to scam the system. They do their jobs to better their communities, the state, and the public.

What bothers me perhaps as much as the misguided policy is the lack of adult leadership provided by Gov. Walker. The childish, disrespectful, and unprecedented game playing by Republican legislators, led by the Fitzgerald brothers, is enough for an additional post on how they stained the history, traditions, and character of the Wisconsin legislature.  But Gov. Walker’s unwillingness to sit down or even talk with public employee unions, unwillingness to negotiate contracts, unwillingness to compromise with legislators (of either party actually), and unwillingness to acknowledge the accepted financial concessions of the unions is absurd. Leadership? Hardly.

Leadership, especially political leadership, isn’t about dividing people into us vs. them. Leadership isn’t about exploiting the economic woes and concerns of families or state budgets to pursue an extreme policy agenda. Leadership isn’t about playing chicken or playing War. Leadership doesn’t willingly offer people’s rights or livelihood as ammunition or accepted collateral. If you look at history, what defines some of our greatest leaders isn’t their stubbornness or unwillingness to negotiate with anyone, it’s their willingness to make principled compromises. There is the saying that you should never compromise on your principles but you should never be unwilling to make a principled compromise. I feel like a middle-aged parent by saying this but, “It’s not so much that I’m mad, it’s that I’m disappointed in you Gov. Walker.” (ok, I am mad too but…) Through his actions, Gov. Walker has revealed that he is not, nor is he interested in being a leader. So far, his actions reveal him to be nothing more than a shameless ideologue.

It is disappointing. It is infuriating. It is shameful. But what we cannot do is let our passions and efforts end at the conclusion of this fight surrounding the rights of public employees to bargain collectively. Win or lose this particular battle over workers’ rights, letting our experiences here serve as the spark and motivation for future and sustained involvement would be the most meaningful “win” possible. Our participation, our contributions, our voice, and our vote in future endeavors is going to be the true measure of what has been happening here in Madison. When all is said and done, looking backward will provide important reflections and lessons on our efforts to organize, our shared pride and passions, and our stand for what is right. But we must take these lessons and reflections and turn them in the only direction our great state tells us, Forward!

History

More to come on this soon…

Photo by Larry Palm

Back to the Blog

So I’ll be the first to admit it, I haven’t been the best blogger lately (lately as in way too long). I apologize. My bad. But I’d like to give it another go, so stay tuned for some posts soon.

Student Engagement in Local Issues

I wanted to post a guest column I submitted to both campus papers a few days ago relating to the success we had in relation to having a student as a voting member on the Alcohol License Review Committee and also call for continued student engagement in local city issues. The column was printed in both the Badger Herald and Daily Cardinal.

______

My name is Bryon Eagon — and no, my first name isn’t misspelled. In addition to being a student at UW, I have the privilege of representing the 8th district as an alder on the City Council here in Madison. Technically, we call it the Common Council, but that’s just semantics. Students are the economic, social and cultural engine of Madison and our opinions and ideas are vital to shaping the future of this great city. But my voice is just one among tens of thousands of young people here in Madison; that’s where you come in. I want to know your thoughts, complaints, suggestions and ideas to help inform my priorities and decisions. Why should students care about the micro of micro levels of government when there are more attractive and flashy issues at the state or national level? Let me try to explain.

Have you ever tried crossing Langdon Street at the intersection on Frances? If so, you’ve probably let out a few obscenities over the blind spots and nonresponsive traffic. That intersection is terrible for pedestrians. Who is responsible for making changes to such a vital public safety issue? The U.S. Congress? The Wisconsin State Legislature? Actually, it is the city’s responsibility. While issues at the city level may not garner the appeal of soaring state or national policies, city government makes decisions that affect our day-to-day lives, oftentimes much more than higher levels of government. From trash pickup to public safety, alcohol regulation to stop signs, we see and experience the decisions made in City Hall every day.

You may have read a few days ago the city is adding a member to the Alcohol License Review Committee and because of students’ engagement and participation, the council recommended and the mayor committed to appointing a student voting member to that committee. So what does this mean for students? A voting student member can promote the kinds of establishments that we, as young people, want in the future of campus and downtown. While there are plenty of places for vertical drinking (where people stand around, down drinks and just hit repeat), there are not nearly enough fun, safe, interactive late-night places for students of all ages. During debates on adding a student to the committee, dozens of students came to the Council meeting and demonstrated how informed, engaged and passionate students can make a difference in city government. We saw a coalition of the Herald and the Cardinal, College Democrats and Republicans, as well as ASM, stepping up to the plate to get involved. I don’t know what part of that last list is more encouraging/historic — the papers working together, campus politicos from both sides of the aisle coming together, or the student government renewing interest in local issues. The council, mayor and the at-large Madison community took notice and were impressed. But this student participation should not and cannot stop with this one meeting.

Student engagement on the ALRC student voting member issue can and should serve as a catalyst for student participation on even more issues. Although issues of alcohol are what unite students the most, so many of us have a greater passion for and are better informed about many more issues than just those surrounding alcohol. The city also deals with issues that involve the environment, transportation, business development, public safety, community services, youth programs, homelessness, parks, pools, tenant and landlord regulations and much more. If you want to make a difference on any of these issues, or have a niche idea of your own, let your voice be heard. The future of Madison rests on the ideas and priorities of young people. If we, as students, do not speak up, contribute and participate in local government, the future of our campus, downtown and city will be decided for us. So e-mail your member of congress, call your state legislator and come testify before or serve on a committee over at City Hall, 210 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Who knows? Maybe if enough students get involved, we can get a four-way stop at Langdon and Frances.

Bryon Eagon is a senior majoring in political science and communication arts. He can be reached at district8@cityofmadison.com, 608-335-5091, or in person during his office hours Mondays from 10 to 11 a.m. at Lakefront on Langdon in Memorial Union and Thursdays from 1 to 2 p.m. at Pop’s Club in Gordon Commons.

Student Voting Member on the ALRC

A few weeks ago, a proposal came before the Common Council Organizational Committee to add a voting Alder to the Alcohol License Review Committee. The committee voiced concerns about the potential and undesired 4-4 ties this addition could create, so the amendment was made to add another citizen voting member to deter such ties.  So far so good, right? But I thought we could do one better:

I introduced a substitute amendment to change the new citizen voting member to a student voting member.

The familiar topics of safety, landlord issues, the environment, and even those not-so-universal issues (snow removal and toxic algae to name a few), are all important and significant issues to students. Here in Madison, and I would assume in many other college-towns, few issues garner more student attention and passion than the issues surrounding alcohol.

With this interest and goals of encouraging active participation from young people in Madison, students deserve a full vote on the city’s most alcohol-centered committee. Not only do students care about the issue of alcohol, they know about and (many often interact with) the issue. Students can provide a unmatched voice and unique perspective about what kinds of establishments and policies Madison should be supporting when in comes to alcohol. Students are more surrounded with the issues of alcohol than probably any other ‘group’ in Madison.

From participating, observing, interacting, responding, hearing, feeling, and experiencing the affects and impacts of alcohol,  students are in-tune with the direct and indirect issues before the ALRC. Thus, students deserve a full vote on the issue and I would argue that students could benefit the committee and city as a whole with this vote because of their unparalled experiences, input, feedback, and ideas.

Now I know some critics may think that students would just be a “rubber stamp” for anything alcohol, but I don’t think that’s the case.  I would challenge those critics to give students a chance to prove them wrong because I know, through experience, that student don’t just want anything alcohol. No, we are smarter and more well-rounded than some think.

Students want fun, safe, interactive places to do more than vertical drinking. We want places where we can do more than just drink, places where we feel safe and comfortable to hang out, eat, play, relax, and have a good time.  I would venture these sentiments aren’t just shared among students, but shared with the wider Madison community as well.

Jamie Stark over at the Daily Cardinal wrote a great piece on the issue, expanding on how the current student “technical adviser” (non-voting position) shows significant student interest in the position.

My amendment failed to pass a few weeks ago, but the opportunity to add a student voting member on the ALRC is far from over, in fact, quite the contrary. The original proposal returns to the CCOC and Common Council this Tuesday, Oct. 6th, and I plan on re-introducing the student voting member amendment, this time armed with the full legal language and definitions that were previously absent, an absence that cause some self-professed would-be-supporters to vote against the amendment because they were unclear of the details. Not a bad reason, I admit. But now the language and details are clear and the time to show that this city can walk the walk in engaging, empowering, and enfranchising (ah, the rhetorical powers of alliteration) students to be full, active, informed, voting members on a committee they care about is now.

Again, I plan to introduce the reformed and defined amendment tomorrow, Oct. 6th at the 4:30pm CCOC meeting and we’ll have to see how that goes and maybe again before the full Council 2 hours later at 6:30pm.

And for all you junkies out there, here is some of the language of the proposed change to add the student voting member:

DRAFTER’S ANALYSIS:  This substitute ordinance adds an alder and an adult resident to the Alcohol License Review Committee.  The Committee will then consist of 9 members:  3 alders and 6 adult citizens, one of which shall be a student at UW-Madison, MATC or Edgewood.  Term of service is revised from two years to three years, except that the student appointee is a 2-year term.  The effective date of this ordinance shall be January 1, 2010.

(c) One of the adult resident appointments shall be a student, at least 18 years of age, enrolled at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison Area Technical College or Edgewood College.  The term of the student appointment shall be two (2) years.  The student governments of each university or college may submit nominations to the Mayor, and any other student may apply for appointment.  The Mayoral student appointment is, like other adult resident appointments, subject to confirmation by the Common Council.

Pass or fail, this initiative for a student voting member on the ALRC has created some great discussions about alcohol policy relating to students and the role students can and should plan on this and other issues here in Madison. Thoughts, feedback, ideas? As always, feel free to email me at: district8@cityofmadison.com

Downtown Coordinating Committee on Campus

The Downtown Coordinating Committee (DCC) is holding its September meeting on the UW campus this Thursday, September 17th at 5:30pm in the Memorial Union (4th floor, Capitol View Room).

The DCC meeting is on campus for the primary reason of hearing from students so please come and share your concerns, ideas, suggestions, complaints, experiences, etc… with an important and influential city committee.

As you can see from the agenda, topics to be discussed are very student-centered, including downtown/campus safety, Halloween, State St, and an open forum to hear from students. This is a unique time to have your voice heard so please take advantage of this great opportunity!

Hope to see you Thursday evening on campus!

Alder Hours

In an effort to continually hear from and talk with students and community members, I will be holding Alder Hours twice a week throughout the fall ’09 semester. Please feel free to stop by and chat about any ideas, concerns, problems, etc..

MONDAYS: 10am-11am @ the Memorial Union, Lakefront on Langdon Room

THURSDAYS: 1:00pm – 2:00pm @ Gordon Commons

lakefront on langdongordon c

Alder Hours are an important way to hear from constituents and I encourage anyone and everyone to stop by and talk, whether it is about city issues or not. Just like office hours for professors and TA’s, Alder Hours are “open door” opportunity to voice your thoughts. All are welcome, not just district residents, but of course students are especially encouraged to stop by. I will have a bright yellow piece of paper to attract you to my table. If you don’t see it, look for the skinny kid with funny black glasses. If you cannot make it to either time, please email me to set up a time to meet! My email is district8@cityofmadison.com

During my campaign for the Common Council I pledged a “Contract with Students” to be a visible and accessible member of campus and of the City of Madison. Alder Hours are an significant part of that pledge and I made the pledge a public “contract” in order to be held accountable to dedicated accessibility, so please come visit and hold me to it. Hope to see you at the Union or Gordon Commons soon!

- Bryon

Coming Soon: U Square Grocery Store

I just got off the phone with the developer and it is confirmed that there will be a new grocery store in the University Square building at the corner of University and Lake.

coming soon

Details are in the works but the tentative schedule is a Sept. 28th build start with a projected opening in the first or second week of January, just as many students will be returning to campus from winter break.

I talked with the developer a few months ago and I understand that the store, which will not be a large national chain, will be a full service grocery store with an added focus on fresh fruits, vegetables, organic options, and pre-made/take-out.

Feel free to call or email me with any questions! district8@cityofmadison.com or 608-335-5091.

University Square Restaurant Proposal

At a recent Alcohol License Review Committee meeting there was a request for an alcohol beverage license for a new establishment hoping to move into the University Square building at 702 W Johnson, which lies in my district.  People may be familiar with the space, as a previous alcohol license was approved for the ‘Field Pass’ in the same location some time ago.

That Field Pass project has since not worked, mainly because of financial reasons, and the space is currently sits about half built.  The previous tenant began building the space with a two story design that has some half and full walls, fixtures, floors poured, plumbing, electrical, etc… built into the space at the present. Costs to remove these already built area are estimated around $750,000 to $1 million, and like I said, that is just to remove everything and start over. Pretty daunting eh? Especially with the economy these days, it didn’t seem likely anyone would be able or willing to make a multi-million dollar investment in that space, hence it’s vacancy since the building’s completion about a year ago.

Enter the team of Scott Acker, owner of the Quaker Steak and Lube in Middleton, and partners Greg Rice, owner of University Square, and Conrad Arnold, a manager at the Lube and owner of the Opis Lounge in downtown Madison. This team came up with a concept that allowed use of the existing built-in parts of the space as well as added their own creative vision for how they felt the space could better be utilized. This project would be about a $4 million dollar infusion into the downtown.

The ALRC questioned and debated this application for around 4 hours (yes I was there for all of it and so was the ASM representative and my former opponent-turned-colleague, Mark Woulf. Mark sits on the ALRC as the newly formed student representative *thanks Eli* and is a non-voting member. As an Alder, I have the privilege to sit on any board or committee as a defacto non-voting member ).  After lengthy and colorful discussions, the ALRC voted to refer the application until the next meeting in September. After multiple meetings with the applicants, walking through the space, talking with those in opposition and hearing from those in support, I want to give my take on the project through this post.

The design of the 702 W Johnson proposal centers around a Wisconsin Badger sports-themed restaurant, think of an ESPN zone meets a Dave and Busters, and is has three main components: First, the first floor, with Wisconsin sports memorabilia,  state-of-the-art interactive games, giant plasma screens, and seating for 450 (their tentative capacity requested for the main floor). Second, a bit more upscale restaurant (not too upscale tho, highest priced item on the menu around $24) on the second floor with tables and chairs for 150 (their tentative projected capacity for this space). Third, a 300 person capacity banquet room area that is also able to be broken down into three 100 person rooms.  (note: the Field Pass design was pretty much one big restaurant/bar with some game area and had a capacity of 550) There are also some ideas floating around of turning some of this space into a bowling alley or some similar mixed use game space.

These three areas have a combined tentative total of a 900 person capacity.  Sound pretty big? Sure is. Sound scary or unsafe? To some it sure does.  That being said, here are some reasons why I support their alcohol license application and reasons why I fully support the development of this restaurant:

  • This is the exact kind of development we want in our downtown/campus community. The city has said, through the density plan passed before my time on the Council, that we don’t want new bars in a certain area of the downtown which this project is in. I have never been a fan of this but ok, lets work with what we have. The project designed in the U Square space is not a bar, it is a restaurant before all else. Will it serve alcohol? Yes, but in order to receive the alcohol license, the operation has to follow the percentage of food vs. alcohol sales that requires more food than booze. I really think that what will draw patrons to this space will be atmosphere and games first, food second, and alcohol third. There are plenty of other places to grab a drink but not too many great Badger sports places to watch a game, grab some food, and hang out with people of all ages. This is a true multidimensional, mixed-use space that we want in the future of our campus and downtown area. This restaurant will be a destination, attracting people to stay in the downtown, infusing more customers into area businesses and even other restaurants and bars.
  • Speaking of all ages, this restaurant will be one of the few places in the campus area for people of all ages to stick around downtown after UW activities and other events, like after Kohl Center games, football games, theater performances, concerts, etc… So many families skip town right after these events because there are not many places they see as “friendly” to grab some food or drink before heading home. Are there some? Sure are. But not many that could match the atmosphere and interactive uses as this U Square plan.
  • This restaurant would provide a safe and fun place for the thousands of 18-20 year olds in the campus area to hang out, especially late night. 18-20 year old students need options. Those in that age range have severely limited options if they want to hang out with friends in a social atmosphere, with many choosing behind the closed doors of dorm rooms and in the crowed apartments or basements in off campus houses or apartments. These are not the safest places, especially when this restaurant could provide a social place for them to be with those 21+, obviously not drinking, but in a fun, interactive place they are in the open, with friends, under the supervision of staff and peers. Campus and the city should be thinking of more ways to get kids out from behind closed doors and into the open, because right now, most of late night entertainment is dominated only for the 21+ crowd.  How nice would it be for freshmen in the dorms to walk across the street at later that 9pm, which is the normal time for bars to kick out those under 21, and play interactive golf or hockey, throw a few games of bowling, or just socialize with their friends of all ages in a fun, Badger sports atmosphere!
  • On capacity, especially late night capacity. Yes there are a number of restaurants and bars in the downtown and all of them combined have a large capacity. However, how many of these places allow 18-20 year olds in past 9pm? How many attract families after events in the campus area? Close to none. I agree with ALRC members that had concerns about capacity that defined conditions are needed to make sure there wont be 900 people on the street at bar time. But when you look at what this place really is, not just what it looks like on the surface, those concerns begin to be addressed. 1. The main sports themed floor has a proposed capacity of 450. This space would be the main all-ages area and therefore would not be 100% people drinking until bar time because of the ability of 18-20 year olds hanging out there late night, watching a game, playing games, or grabbing some food. Furthermore, part of this space would be open past bar time, allowing patrons to grab late night food or water/sodas, significantly reducing the problems we have seen when everyone is kicked out at bar time and there are hundreds of people on the sidewalk at once, plus add having a number of them being inebriated and you have even more issues. The applicants even agreed to stop serving alcohol earlier than required by law, which has the added benefit of clearing out those who are only looking for that last drink or two to put them over the top and keeps those in the space who are looking to hang out or grab some food on their way out. Finally, this space has something like only 30 bar stools on the whole level, with seating for the whole capacity of 450. Know what that means? Almost non-existent vertical drinking space and service at tables by servers. How many places downtown guarantee a place to sit?! Plus, having a server take food and drink orders adds to the safety of those drinking with another pair of eyes regulating people’s intake of alcohol. 2. The fine dining area, with a proposed capacity of 150. This space has 6 bar stools and the rest are table settings, again serviced by servers.  This space would not occupy a full 150 people drinking until bar time and therfore reduces the number of people drinking late night. I agree with ALRC members that the capacity of this area needs to be defined in a license condition as to when time this area will be open until. If the applicants can define in a condition that this area will not be open past say 12 or 12:30pm or something, I think those with capactiy concerns will be more comfortable, as will I. 3. The final area that is of now slotted as banquet space with a proposed capacity of 300. Like the fine dining area, this space should have defined capacity related to time, reducing the late night capacity. Say the fine dining will be open at the latest until 12pm and say they are at 50% capacity at midnight and therefore have 75 people that have to leave. Even if they all want to go down to the main level, they cannot if that level’s capacity is full, and if its not full, their 75 would be added to the count downstairs and therefore not exceed their 450 capacity. If the latest the banquet space is open is 1am, they have to follow the same rules. With ideas of turning that space into a possible bowling alley, that naturally would reduce that space’s capacity. THEREFORE, the total capacity at bar time, 1:30pm on Sunday through Thursday and 2am Friday and Saturday, would be the 450 from the main floor. That, considering the Field Pass was approved with 550 and had limited to no similar conditions, and the fact that the whole 450 does not have to be out on the sidewalk a minute after bar time, like most places, because of their late night food service till 3am or so, would help the trickle out method that would reduce crowds. Not to open up Pandora’s box, but there are bars in the area, just bars serving only alcohol, that have similar or even a larger capacity than 450 that kick their whole capacity out at bar time, so arguments that a place with less capacity than those, a place that also serves food until 3pm, is less safe doesn’t fully fit this case.
  • The main first floor area will serve breakfast starting at 6am, take out or dine-in lunches, and food until 3am.  Also, the banquet area will not severe alcohol without the accompaniment of food.
  • The applicants estimated the project will create 225 new jobs in the downtown and campus community, many of which will be part-time jobs for students.

Overall, there are absolutely details to be worked out to address the many serious concerns and issues that this scale of a project entails. Again, I strongly feel this is the kind of place we want as a campus and downtown community and also the kind of place we should be encouraging as a city. I am going to try to meet with the applicants to discuss their plans and possible conditions, continue to talk with those who have concerns, and am sure I’ll continue to hear from those that are flat out opposed to the project. I want this project to happen and am open to hearing creative ideas as to how we can make this opportunity work.

If you want let me know what you think, shoot me and email at district8@cityofmadison.com or call me at 608-335-5091. Again, if you feel strongly on either side of the project, the Alcohol License Review Committee is going to re-take-up the application at their September meeting, to which I will definitely publicize and link to once I know the details.

Mayor’s Blog Entry on Students

I want to share a blog entry from Madison’s Mayor, Dave Cieslewicz, about the impact and role of students in Madison. The Mayor has become quite the blogger and I am happy to see some words about the student community here in Madison. With some 42,000 at UW, around 15,000 at MATC, and about 2,000 more at Edgewood,  college and university students make up a HUGE portion of Madison’s intellectual, social, cultural, and economic engine.

The Evolution of a Couch

August 13, 2009 1:34 PM

Over the next few days, the terraces of downtown Madison will become stacked with the flotsam of middle class America. A lovely mauve couch, the height of fashion in 1985, will go to its final resting place after starting life in a place of honor in the living room, then moving down to the family rec room, then on to a student rental and then another one and another one until it ends up on the curb on Gilman Street.

The UW is the largest, most influential institution in our city, far outdistancing state government or any one industry. The UW provides good paying, stable jobs to 16,000 faculty and staff. Ideas hatched at the UW often spin off into successful businesses that create wealth and employ still more people.

But the biggest asset of the UW for our city is the students themselves. Every year 6,000 or so of the brightest young people in the world come here as freshmen. (Thankfully the old Board of Regents admissions standards weren’t so tough back in 1979, or I wouldn’t be here writing this today.) It’s these kids who will eventually hatch some of those ideas and build some of those businesses and virtually every one of them will develop a life-long attachment to our town. They’ll speak of Madison fondly wherever their lives take them, providing us better advertising then any marketing campaign could ever create. And from time to time most of them will return for a weekend, reconnecting with some of their fondest memories of Madison and pumping up our tourism economy while they’re here.

Maybe most importantly, students keep us young and vibrant. Each new batch of students brings their own music, clothes, ideas and energy to town along with their stereos, beat up couches and retro lava lamps. The annual influx of new young blood keeps Madison connected to the latest trends in everything…and provides the final resting place for tons of once prized family furniture.

For most of us college is about choosing a career, learning who we are and making lifelong friendships. So, the social aspects of college life are important, and that shouldn’t be forgotten by people of my age who want nothing more after nine o’clock then a good book and the remote control. The UW has long held a deserved reputation as a place of high academic standards and achievement, but also a place where those same hard working scholars know how to have a good time. That reputation and the kind of young person it attracts have shaped our city for decades. Smart but not full of ourselves, hard working but fun loving is who we are as a people.

So, welcome back kids. Study hard. Have some fun. And remember that moderation in all things is not a bad piece of advice.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.